It was a pan-European project that set out to create a more socially-interactive robot, one capable of providing companionship to children in hospitals. Along the way, however, it thrust ñ University into the very heart of a continental debate over the ethics of human-robot interaction.
At its launch in 2010, ALIZ-E, a four-and-a-half-year, €8.3 million European Commission-funded project led by ñ, considered whether it was possible to develop a robot capable of acting as a companion to a child in hospital. It tasked each of nine partners to use their research strengths, whether it was speech recognition at the National Research Council in Italy, or the development of ñޘcloudñޙ computing techniques in France to power the robotsñޙ intelligence.
It became apparent, however, that technology was simply not ready to realise that vision, with naturalistic, meaningful conversation beyond even the capability of cloud-powered artificial intelligence. But as the project progressed through consultation and focus groups with medical staff at San Raffaele Hospital in Milan, one of the partners, a new direction emerged, one that placed the robot in the role of educator.
The ñޘNaoñޙ robots ñޓ each standing around 60 centimetres tall, and costing around £10,000 ñޓ began to work with children in San Raffaele, especially those suffering from diabetes. It quickly became apparent that the young patients warmed to the robots as a social presence.
ñޜYou could see a tangible social connection, and a response to the robotñޙs ñޘpersonalityñޙ,ñޝ said Tony Belpaeme, Professor in Cognitive Systems and Robotics, and academic lead for ALIZE. ñޜWe found that in this environment, the child was much more receptive to information, far more so than when it was presented in other formats. It was a brilliant insight for us.ñޝ
As word of the trialñޙs success spread, so other hospitals came on board ñޓ three in the Netherlands, two in London, and one in Barcelona. It also led to the forging of close links with patient groups, such as diabetes associations in Italy and the Netherlands, who proved hugely influential in finding families eager to take part in the trials.
A key part of the project saw Tony and the ñ team take the robots to schools right across Devon, conducting research on the interaction with pupils, and using the results to update the artificial intelligence algorithms. At the same time, this offered the team the chance to carry out some inspiring outreach work.
Tony said: ñޜI think one of the most profound legacies for us was that we were able to take robotics research out of the laboratory, and conduct it in the ñޘnatural habitatñޙ, so to speak, of children. We were the first to do that and to insist on doing that.ñޝ
ALIZ-E came to a conclusion in 2014, with ñ drawing together the research of all partners into a final report. But its legacy effect is likely to go on being felt in a number of areas for many years to come. For example, the EC has now funded a new project called DREAM, which will use the Nao robots in research with autistic children.
