- psychological
- emotional
- physical
- social
- biophilic ÂÌñ»»ÆÞ“ natural connection.
Toolkit ÂÌñ»»ÆÞ“ analysing your data
In order to analyse the data you have collected you need to categorise or ÂÌñ»»ÆÞ˜testÂÌñ»»ÆÞ™ it against something
Ensure you record negative as well as positive occurrences of the indicators.
Example [from a written observation]: ÂÌñ»»ÆÞ˜AA seems very under confident physically, walking over rough ground is tricky and he doesnÂÌñ»»ÆÞ™t like small branches crossing the pathÂÌñ»»ÆÞ™. This is a negative occurrence of ÂÌñ»»ÆÞ˜confidence in and enjoyment of physical activityÂÌñ»»ÆÞ™.
Sometimes you might want to use more than one indicator to the same piece of data.
Example 1: ÂÌñ»»ÆÞ˜All the students enjoyed sitting round the fire and seemed relaxed and happy.ÂÌñ»»ÆÞ™
Indicator 1: Relaxed; Indicator 2: Experiencing positive emotions and moods
Example 2: ÂÌñ»»ÆÞ˜BB reminded people not to walk too close to the fireÂÌñ»»ÆÞ™
Indicator 1: Feelings of being competent; Indicator 2: Confidence in supporting others
When you start searching and analysing your data, you may find that you want to add one or more of your own indicators.
Example: In some Good from Woods projects these extra indicators were added as they seemed to recur in the data: feelings of awe or wonder, a feeling of being outside of yourselves or part of a bigger picture.
Try to keep a balance between adding new indicators and sticking to the ones already provided. Too many new indicators means your research wonÂÌñ»»ÆÞ™t be comparable with others and make analysis more difficult. But donÂÌñ»»ÆÞ™t try to shoehorn data under indicators where it really doesnÂÌñ»»ÆÞ™t fit, as you may miss an important/interesting theme.
Using indicators to code your data is not an exact science! Different practitioner-researchers will understand and interpret the indicators in different ways. The important thing is that you are consistent within your own coding. ItÂÌñ»»ÆÞ™s useful to add notes to explain how youÂÌñ»»ÆÞ™ve used an indicator as well as examples in your report.
How do I really know thatÂÌñ»»ÆÞ™s what people are feeling?
You may feel you are interpreting other peopleÂÌñ»»ÆÞ™s feelings based on your own reactions and emotions, especially if you are working with very young children or people who have limited verbal communication. However, all research is about interpreting. ItÂÌñ»»ÆÞ™s good to use a number of different methods to access peopleÂÌñ»»ÆÞ™s views and feelings, which can help confirm what you think is happening.
Example: when working with a group of people with learning disabilities, a researcher was concerned that the observations in her reflective diary did not really represent what participants were feeling. Comparison with another researcherÂÌñ»»ÆÞ™s observations and analysis of videos backed up her choice of indicators.
You could also try taking your findings back to the groups youÂÌñ»»ÆÞ™ve been working with to check them.
Example: showing participants and their carers some of the video footage that was taken and asking them to discuss what they think of it to help confirm or challenge your ideas.
After you have assigned an indicator to a chunk of data, decide who, what or where is the main contributor to the wellbeing. This can help you to work out how people are accessing wellbeing, from the environment, people or activity.
Example 1: ÂÌñ»»ÆÞ˜CC seemed to enjoy cooking the popcorn and was really concentrating.ÂÌñ»»ÆÞ™
Indicator: Purposeful; Who,what,where: What ÂÌñ»»ÆÞ“ practical task.
Example 2: ÂÌñ»»ÆÞ˜The rest of the group were very encouraging to DD who was walking through the woodÂÌñ»»ÆÞ™
Indicator: Safe and supported in social relationships; Who,what,where: Who ÂÌñ»»ÆÞ“ whole group.
Good from Woods projects each made up their own Who, What, Where labels and what you use will depend on the setting and your group, so this Toolkit doesnÂÌñ»»ÆÞ™t contain a list. To give you an idea, some other examples were: What ÂÌñ»»ÆÞ“ being alone, the fire, doing something unusual; Who ÂÌñ»»ÆÞ“ staff and group leaders, small group, self; Where ÂÌñ»»ÆÞ“ in the woods, in a familiar place, in a different place.
Not all the data you collect will generate useful evidence. Do discard anything that you feel doesnÂÌñ»»ÆÞ™t contribute to the research ÂÌñ»»ÆÞ“ youÂÌñ»»ÆÞ™ll have plenty of other data to analyse!
Example: ÂÌñ»»ÆÞ˜Our feedback games (playing woodland charades) were fun and people joined in, but we didnÂÌñ»»ÆÞ™t feel the information collected told us anything about how they had felt about being in woodland.ÂÌñ»»ÆÞ™