In our latest research bulletin Dr James Gregory, Associate Professor of Modern British History, tells us about Queen Victoria and the Hangman. James is completing the first of two books looking at cultures of mercy in Britain and the British world in the Victorian era, and in the longer period of 1760 ÂÌñ»»ÆÞ“ 1960. This research builds on his earlier studies of the movement against capital punishment, and Victorian vegetarianism. The first book takes Queen Victoria as the central figure in the study, but another figure loomed largely in the nineteenth-century imagination.
In an age of media-driven celebrity, when Queen VictoriaÂÌñ»»ÆÞ™s activities were recorded in detail by the burgeoning newspaper press, royalty had a rival in peopleÂÌñ»»ÆÞ™s fascination with lurid details of murders and the work of the public hangman. A ÂÌñ»»ÆÞ˜Newgate Circular,ÂÌñ»»ÆÞ™ ÂÌñ»»ÆÞ“ its name satirising the ÂÌñ»»ÆÞ˜Court circularÂÌñ»»ÆÞ™ that detailed royal activities and also referencing Newgate gaol in London where men and women were hanged (publicly until 1868) ÂÌñ»»ÆÞ“ appeared in The Satirist journal in 1845. In this article, the Satirist observed that even the movements of ÂÌñ»»ÆÞ˜Royalty and Prince Albert appear to create far less sensationÂÌñ»»ÆÞ™ than what the hangman got up to in his grisly trade.
Like royalty, the hangman was on the move across the United Kingdom, assisted by the railway. Half a decade after hanging became an affair carried out within prisons, the Dundee Advertiser commented on one flying (but as it turned out, abortive) professional visit from the London hangman to Scotland in 1873, ÂÌñ»»ÆÞ˜if their visitor had been a Royal personage or an eminent statesman he could hardly have been treated with greater consideration.ÂÌñ»»ÆÞ™[1] To signify his ÂÌñ»»ÆÞ˜officialÂÌñ»»ÆÞ™ status, William Calcraft, the chief British hangman of the period, allegedly had his boot and shoe shop decorated with the sign ÂÌñ»»ÆÞ˜Executioner to her MajestyÂÌñ»»ÆÞ™.[2]
